Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

< Back to Article

Fig 1.

Visual representation of the current hypothesis on impacts.

More »

Fig 1 Expand

Fig 2.

Number of participants per phase.

Abbreviation: SRs: Systematic Reviews, NR: Not reported.

More »

Fig 2 Expand

Fig 3.

Median answers on planning and designing subsequent research after conducting a preclinical SR.

This graph shows medians per question of a 7 points Likert scale. On this scale, 1 corresponded to completely disagree and 7 to completely agree. Thus, medians with values of 5 or above indicate agreement with the statements. Number of participants (n = 11).

More »

Fig 3 Expand

Fig 4.

Median answers on writing subsequent research after conducting a preclinical SR.

This graph shows medians per question of a 7 points Likert scale. On this scale, 1 corresponded to completely disagree and 7 to completely agree. Thus, median with values of 5 or above indicate agreement with the statements. Number of participants (n = 10).

More »

Fig 4 Expand

Fig 5.

Median answers on appraising research and critical stance after conducting (part of) a preclinical SR.

This graph shows medians per question of a 7 points Likert scale. On this scale, 1 corresponded to completely disagree and 7 to completely agree. Thus, medians with values of 5 or above indicate agreement with the statements. The total number of participants was 31 for the “Completed SR” group and 18 for the “Ongoing SR” group.

More »

Fig 5 Expand

Fig 6.

Process and steps by which conducting preclinical SRs impacts researchers and research at different levels.

More »

Fig 6 Expand