Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

< Back to Article

Table 1.

Two-dimensional BKS.

More »

Table 1 Expand

Fig 1.

A hierarchical agent-based framework with the BKS.

More »

Fig 1 Expand

Table 2.

Prediction outputs of Agents 1 and 2.

More »

Table 2 Expand

Table 3.

Creation of BKS for the classification scenario in Table 2.

More »

Table 3 Expand

Fig 2.

Configuration of the hierarchical agent-based framework used in the experiments.

More »

Fig 2 Expand

Table 4.

List and descriptions of benchmark datasets.

More »

Table 4 Expand

Table 5.

Accuracy rates.

More »

Table 5 Expand

Table 6.

F1 scores.

More »

Table 6 Expand

Fig 3.

Number of BKS wins over majority voting in data sets with and without noise (red, yellow, and green lines indicate the threshold of wins requires for significance level of α = 0.1, 0.05 and 0.01, respectively).

More »

Fig 3 Expand

Table 7.

Accuracy rates with and without noise.

More »

Table 7 Expand

Table 8.

Comparison of F1 scores with literature (best in bold).

More »

Table 8 Expand

Table 9.

List of features and description.

More »

Table 9 Expand

Fig 4.

Feature importance using DT, RF, and XGBoost.

More »

Fig 4 Expand

Table 10.

Accuracy rates and BKS wins with noise added.

More »

Table 10 Expand

Table 11.

F1 scores with noise added.

More »

Table 11 Expand

Table 12.

Accuracy rates with different ratios of minority to majority samples.

More »

Table 12 Expand