Fig 1.
Map showing countries included in the analysis by percent Muslim.
Mollweide projection used to preserve area proportions.
Fig 2.
Dotplot of percentage of Muslim respondents who support three different questions measuring support for violent practices for the violation of norms.
Countries are ordered from lowest to highest average level of support across all three questions.
Table 1.
Results from multilevel models predicting support for violent practices for violating norms among Muslims.
Table 2.
Standard deviation and correlation between random intercepts and slopes for religiosity and education.
Fig 3.
Lollipop plots of the association between religiosity/education and support for violent practices in each country.
Values are based on random slopes from Model 3 of Table 1. Each panel is ordered from largest to smallest association. Values are color-coded by direction.
Fig 4.
Scatterplot showing the relationship betwen a country’s average level of support for violent practices and the association between education/religiosity and support for violent practices in a country.
Values are based on random intercepts and slopes from Model 3 of Table 1. Best fitting OLS line is shown in each panel.
Fig 5.
Scatterplot showing the relationship between country-level associations of education and religiosity with support for violent practices.
Values based on random slopes from Model 3 of Table 1. Best-fitting OLS line is shown in each panel.