Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

< Back to Article

Fig 1.

Vision Simulator screen for glare–halo adjustment.

This simulator could reproduce the size and intensity of the glare, halo, and starburst by moving the slide bars and changing the images. Each reproduced image is converted into numeric values and displayed at the bottom of the screen.

More »

Fig 1 Expand

Fig 2.

Vision Simulator screen for detailed settings for the halo.

This simulator enables detailed settings for the halo; the number of rings, ring width, and interval between the rings can be reproduced.

More »

Fig 2 Expand

Fig 3.

Gradations projected onto a Vision Simulator screen.

These gradations were marked around the light sources at intervals of 5 cm from the center of the halo ring.

More »

Fig 3 Expand

Table 1.

Fixed and proportional biases in the results of the PPT.

More »

Table 1 Expand

Table 2.

ICCs between the inter-rater and inter-patient reliability and the measured PPT values.

More »

Table 2 Expand

Table 3.

Mean age of the patients according to IOL type and mean measured photic phenomena values in the PPT.

More »

Table 3 Expand

Fig 4.

Mean value of the (A) glare size, (B) halo size, (C) halo intensity, (D) halo ring width, (E) starburst size, and (F) starburst intensity for each IOL group.

More »

Fig 4 Expand

Fig 5.

Mean images of the photic phenomena of the (A) Symfony, (B) PanOptix, and (C) Clareon groups on the Vision Simulator. These are based on the mean values of various parameters.

More »

Fig 5 Expand