Table 1.
Data applied in the case studies.
Fig 1.
Spatial representation of the results of the case study ‘regional soil-based climate change mitigation’.
Table 2.
Quantitative results of the case study ‘regional soil-based climate change mitigation’.
Fig 2.
Spatial representation of selected results of the case study ‘state-wide habitat conservation siting’.
Table 3.
Quantitative results of the case study ‘state-wide habitat conservation siting’.
Fig 3.
Comparison of the potentially usable areas for onshore wind energy (left: First model run; right: Second model run [24]).
Fig 4.
Comparison of the selection of built-up areas from the Basis-DLM (left) and DLM250 (right) with a noise buffer of 750 m exemplified by the municipality of Straßlach-Dingharting south of Munich.
Fig 5.
Comparison of the two elevation models DEM50 and DEM200 with a slope ≥ 30° illustrated by the example of a Bavarian Alps section (left) and a Harz section (right).