Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

< Back to Article

Fig 1.

Peak atrial longitudinal strain (PALS) and peak atrial contraction strain (PACS) in a patient without atrial fibrillation recurrence (A, B) and with atrial fibrillation recurrence (C, D), respectively.

More »

Fig 1 Expand

Table 1.

Baseline characteristics of the study population.

More »

Table 1 Expand

Table 2.

Echocardiography characteristics of the study population.

More »

Table 2 Expand

Fig 2.

Chi—Square statistics for different models for the prediction of atrial fibrillation (AF) recurrence.

Values indicate the percentages of increase in Chi—square for every model. Statistical comparison by likelihood ratio tests. *Model#1: persistent AF, recurrence during the blanking period, left atrium diameter index ≥ 2.36 cm/m2; global Chi—square = 33.4. **Model#2: Model#1* + left atrium volume index ≥ 41.9 ml/m2, 21% increase in Chi—square. †Model#3: Model#2* + peak atrial longitudinal strain ≤ 17%, 37% increase in Chi—square.

More »

Fig 2 Expand

Table 3.

Multivariable analysis for the prediction of AF recurrence after the blanking period.

More »

Table 3 Expand

Fig 3.

Kaplan—Meier AF—Free survival curve stratified by the optimal cut-off value of peak atrial longitudinal strain (PALS).

More »

Fig 3 Expand