Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

< Back to Article

Fig 1.

Morphological Mutch classification system.

Illustration shows the three types of the morphological Mutch classification (type 1: avulsion, type 2: split, type 3: depression).

More »

Fig 1 Expand

Fig 2.

Split type 2 of GT fragment according to the morphological Mutch classification in a multi-part fracture of a 62-year-old patient.

Plain radiograph (a), 2-D CT (b), and 3-D CT (c).

More »

Fig 2 Expand

Fig 3.

Histogram of both examined fracture groups showing age distribution and moving average trend lines.

More »

Fig 3 Expand

Table 1.

Interobserver reliability assessed with Fleiss’ kappa (k).

More »

Table 1 Expand

Table 2.

Intraobserver reliability assessed with Cohens’ kappa (k).

More »

Table 2 Expand

Table 3.

Total amount of observers`selections (n (%)) for both fracture groups, and each imaging modality.

More »

Table 3 Expand