Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

< Back to Article

Fig 1.

Percentage of under-5 deaths at ages 1 to 23 months in DHS surveys.

Percentage estimated for each of the 204 selected surveys. Neonatal deaths not represented in the graph.

More »

Fig 1 Expand

Fig 2.

Cumulative probability of dying from birth to age x for the Bolivia 1989 DHS.

More »

Fig 2 Expand

Fig 3.

Data versus model predictions in the relationship between infant and child mortality.

U5MD-VR is for Under-5 Mortality Database vital records. For the regional classification of DHS, CSSA is for Central, South, and Southeast Asia, LAC is for Latin America & Caribbean, NA/WA/E is for North Africa/West Asia/Europe, SSA is for Sub-Saharan Africa.

More »

Fig 3 Expand

Table 1.

Maximum values of mean error of predictions (%) defining a good fit of the k-model.

More »

Table 1 Expand

Table 2.

Numbers and percentages of surveys included in the analysis according to the 90% and 99% maximum values of fitting error.

More »

Table 2 Expand

Fig 4.

Predicted vs observed ratio of the IMR in individual DHS surveys by world region with predictions made using the k-model or MLTs.

CSSA is for Central, South, and Southeast Asia. LAC is for Latin America & Caribbean. NA/WA/E is for North Africa/West Asia/Europe. Sub-Saharan Africa results are not showed because they include only one survey.

More »

Fig 4 Expand

Fig 5.

Predicted vs observed ratio of the IMR in individual DHS surveys by decade with predictions made using the k-model or MLTs.

More »

Fig 5 Expand

Fig 6.

Examples of surveys with very good fit of the k-model.

Prediction errors are within the 90% maximum values. The k-model was fitted to the observed q(x) values using ages 0–8 and 24–60 months only. The ticker vertical line indicates the comparison between the observed and predicted infant mortality rate (IMR).

More »

Fig 6 Expand

Fig 7.

Examples of surveys with relatively good fit of the k-model.

Prediction errors are between the 90% and 99% maximum values. The k-model was fitted to the observed q(x) values using ages 0–8 and 24–60 months only. The ticker vertical line indicates the comparison between the observed and predicted infant mortality rate (IMR).

More »

Fig 7 Expand

Fig 8.

Examples of surveys excluded from analysis due to poor fit of the k-model.

Prediction errors are outside the 99% maximum values. The k-model was fitted to the observed q(x) values using ages 0–8 and 24–60 months only. The ticker vertical line indicates the comparison between the observed and predicted infant mortality rate (IMR).

More »

Fig 8 Expand

Fig 9.

Mean prediction error (%) of k-model among excluded surveys by region.

CSSA is for Central, South, and Southeast Asia. SA is for Sub-Saharan Africa.

More »

Fig 9 Expand