Fig 1.
Impact of treatments on growth root fresh weight (A), shoot fresh weight (B), root dry weight (C), shoot dry weight (D), root length (E) and shoot length (F) of two wheat genotypes (Markaz 19 and Ujala 16) after 35 d of growth in pots. All values are the mean of 4 replicates. Error bars are showing ± standard error. Different letters on bars are significantly different at p < 0.05 according to LSD test. C: Control, SS+TU: sewage sludge+thiourea, TU: thiourea, SS: sewage sludge.
Fig 2.
Effect of different treatments on chlorophyll a (A), chlorophyll b (B), total chlorophyll (C) and carotenoids (D) of two wheat genotypes (Markaz 19 and Ujala 16) after 35 d of growth in pots. All values are the mean of 4 replicates. Error bars are showing ± standard error. Different letters on bars are significantly different at p < 0.05 according to LSD test. C: Control, SS+TU: sewage sludge+thiourea, TU: thiourea, SS: sewage sludge.
Fig 3.
Influence of different treatments on SOD (A), POD (B), APx (C) and soluble sugar (D) contents of two wheat genotypes (Markaz 19 and Ujala 16) after 35 d of the growth period in pots. All values are the mean of 4 replicates. Error bars are showing ± standard error. Different letters on bars are significantly different at p < 0.05 according to LSD test. C: Control, SS+TU: sewage sludge+thiourea, TU: thiourea, SS: sewage sludge.
Fig 4.
Impact of different treatments on MDA (A), H2O2 (B), EL (C) and proline contents (D) of two wheat genotypes (Markaz 19 and Ujala 16) after 35 d of the growth period in pots. All values are the mean of 4 replicates. Error bars are showing ± standard error. Different letters on bars are significantly different at p < 0.05 according to LSD test. C: Control, SS+TU: sewage sludge+thiourea, TU: thiourea, SS: sewage sludge.
Table 1.
Effect of different treatments on ionic contents like sodium, calcium, potassium, phosphorous and soluble proteins constituents of two wheat genotypes (Markaz 19 and Ujala 16) after 35 d of the growth period in pots.