Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

< Back to Article

Fig 1.

Diagram of case selection based on a) urine bioassay measurements, b) post-mortem plutonium activity concentrations in the liver and skeleton, c) both criteria.

More »

Fig 1 Expand

Fig 2.

Urine measurements as a function of time after employment start date.

Each chronic exposure period is indicated by the gray area (start day 0 not shown). Real measurements are displayed as circles with error bars above and below, <MDA/2 are displayed as squares with error bar below.

More »

Fig 2 Expand

Table 1.

Summary of urine bioassay measurements.

More »

Table 1 Expand

Table 2.

Summary of the tissue radiochemical analysis results.

More »

Table 2 Expand

Table 3.

Plutonium activities in the liver, skeleton, and liver+skeleton at the time of death predicted using urine bioassay.

More »

Table 3 Expand

Fig 3.

Bias in liver (left) and skeleton (right) activities predicted from urine bioassays.

More »

Fig 3 Expand

Fig 4.

Bias in liver+skeleton activities predicted from urine bioassays.

More »

Fig 4 Expand

Table 4.

Committed effective doses calculated using five different sets of data.

More »

Table 4 Expand

Fig 5.

Position of committed effective dose EU+LS between ELS and EU (Bq d–1).

Vertical dotted line at 50% indicates the average of ELS and EU.

More »

Fig 5 Expand

Table 5.

Absorbed lifetime and 50-y projected doses to selected organs.

More »

Table 5 Expand

Fig 6.

Skeleton-to-liver 239Pu activity ratio.

More »

Fig 6 Expand