Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

< Back to Article

Fig 1.

Sagittal alignment parameters in the standing position.

Spinal parameters, TK (thoracic kyphosis), LL (lumbar lordosis), and the SVA (sagittal vertical axis), were measured on a lateral whole-spine radiograph (a). Pelvic parameters, the PT (pelvic tilt), SS (sacral slope), and PI (pelvic incidence), were measured (b). Lower limb parameters, the FOA (femur obliquity angle) and KFA (knee flexion angle), were measured (c).

More »

Fig 1 Expand

Fig 2.

The constructed musculoskeletal model using the Anybody Modeling System.

The constructed model altered the thorax, muscle attachment points, and pathways.

More »

Fig 2 Expand

Fig 3.

The method for simulating pelvic lower limb alignment in the musculoskeletal models.

“θ” is the difference between the model default angle “α” and the patient’s actual measured value “β,” indicating the actual angle to be input into the model. Input “θPT” to be the patient measured value “βPT” (a). Input the values of “θhip” “θknee” for hip and knee joint angles (b). Input “θss” to be the patient measured value “βSS” (c).

More »

Fig 3 Expand

Fig 4.

A patient’s full body lateral radiograph and images of the modified musculoskeletal model.

This image shows the full-body lateral radiograph of a patient. A modified musculoskeletal model was used to input the patient’s sagittal alignment.

More »

Fig 4 Expand

Fig 5.

Hip joint diagram for the calculation of muscle contribution to the HCF.

The hip penetration force was the force exerted by an adjacent body segment. Muscle tension alone contributed to the HCF. Using the inverse dynamics analysis, the HCF was calculated using three components: anterior/posterior (AP), proximal/distal (PD), and medial/lateral (ML). The HCF was calculated by combining these three force vectors.

More »

Fig 5 Expand

Table 1.

Clinical characteristics of all patients.

More »

Table 1 Expand

Table 2.

Spearman’s rank correlation coefficients of the HCF with patients’ sagittal alignment parameters.

More »

Table 2 Expand

Fig 6.

Correlation between the sagittal vertical axis (SVA) and hip contact force (HCF).

More »

Fig 6 Expand

Table 3.

Comparison of the low SVA and high SVA groups.

More »

Table 3 Expand

Fig 7.

An example case of the high SVA group.

Lateral radiographs of the whole spine and lower limb in the standing position.TK, thoracic kyphosis; LL, lumbar lordosis; PT, pelvic tilt; SS, sacral slope; PI, pelvic incidence; SVA, sagittal vertical axis; FOA, femur obliquity angle; KFA, knee flexion angle.

More »

Fig 7 Expand