Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

< Back to Article

Fig 1.

Parts of an orchid flower.

The flower is made up of sepals and petals; there is only one labellum and it may have its own separate color.

More »

Fig 1 Expand

Fig 2.

RGB color model as 9 × 13 matrix M.

White is located at the right bottom cell; the blue color, columns 7–9, does not occur in our orchids.

More »

Fig 2 Expand

Fig 3.

Color scheme scenario.

More »

Fig 3 Expand

Fig 4.

Scenarios for Color of Flower (CF).

More »

Fig 4 Expand

Fig 5.

Scenarios for Color of Labellum (CL).

More »

Fig 5 Expand

Fig 6.

A selection of pictures of orchids in the dataset used in our research.

More »

Fig 6 Expand

Table 1.

The depth of the network model.

More »

Table 1 Expand

Table 2.

Setting of deep learning architecture.

More »

Table 2 Expand

Fig 7.

Multi-class classifier.

More »

Fig 7 Expand

Table 3.

The confusion matrices; (a) without normalization and (b) normalized.

More »

Table 3 Expand

Fig 8.

The performance of deep learning architecture on orchid flower dataset.

More »

Fig 8 Expand

Table 4.

Accuracy and F1 for the multi-class classifiers.

More »

Table 4 Expand

Table 5.

Accuracy and F1 for the combined binary classifiers.

More »

Table 5 Expand

Table 6.

Accuracy of method 1 by including and excluding inconsistent results.

More »

Table 6 Expand

Table 7.

Accuracy of MLTC and MLCR method on each color scheme.

More »

Table 7 Expand

Fig 9.

Overview of the performance of the various classifiers studied.

More »

Fig 9 Expand

Fig 10.

Number of images for each color related to the F1-score of the various classifiers.

More »

Fig 10 Expand

Fig 11.

The confusion matrices for primary color: (a) CL1 and (b) CL2 using the ensemble classifier.

More »

Fig 11 Expand

Fig 12.

The confusion matrices for primary color: (a) CF1 and (b) CF2 using ensemble classifier.

More »

Fig 12 Expand

Fig 13.

The color of the orchids seen in the pictures (purple) corresponds to the literature, whereas the classifier predicted white as their color.

More »

Fig 13 Expand

Fig 14.

According to the literature, the orchid should be white.

Yet, the picture clearly shows a pink-purple flower, where the classifier predicted purple as color (which includes pink in our color scheme), which was counted as being incorrect.

More »

Fig 14 Expand

Fig 15.

Examples of images that are hard to classify because of photographic imperfections or non-blooming stages of the orchid.

More »

Fig 15 Expand

Table 8.

Distribution of misclassified images.

More »

Table 8 Expand

Table 9.

Effect on the accuracy of the classifier after label modification and counting correct predictions in terms of set-membership.

More »

Table 9 Expand

Table 10.

The performance of the multi-class classifier using primary and secondary color after dropping the property of color commutativity.

More »

Table 10 Expand