Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

< Back to Article

Fig 1.

Network structure of the model(s).

Every compartment (except S and E) has a quarantined version, transitions into which occur via testing. New infections are transmitted by individuals of the classes coloured red (with the stage Is2 being less infectious). Classes R and Im (mortalities) are no longer infectious.

More »

Fig 1 Expand

Table 1.

Interventions considered in the basic UK model.

More »

Table 1 Expand

Fig 2.

Plot of log-posterior and log-prior.

Models without change in IFR in blue, models with change in IFR in orange.

More »

Fig 2 Expand

Table 2.

Summary of MAP results.

More »

Table 2 Expand

Fig 3.

Mean trajectories of weekly cases and deaths for model variants BC0 and BC1.

Deterministic trajectories for the MAP parameters of models BC0 (dashed blue) and BC1 (solid orange), along with data (black).

More »

Fig 3 Expand

Fig 4.

Mean trajectories of weekly cases and deaths for further model variants.

Deterministic trajectories for the MAP parameters of the various model variants, along with data (black). Models without change in IFR are shown as dashed, models with change in IFR solid.

More »

Fig 4 Expand

Fig 5.

Estimated fraction of infected population conditional on observation.

Mean fraction of people infected (symptomatic and asymptomatic) in the total population, conditional on the observation of cases and deaths in models BC0 (blue), BC1 (orange) and P0 (grey). For comparison, we also show the prevalence of infections reported in the ONS infection survey.

More »

Fig 5 Expand

Fig 6.

Logarithm of the posterior distribution along a slice of the parameter space.

Data for model variants BC1 (blue) and C1 (orange) are shown. The computed posterior is shown as points, the Gaussian approximation of Eq (5) is shown as solid lines. We vary the onset time (left) and the factor (right) of the change in IFR around the value of θ*, keeping all other parameters fixed. Values shown for the log-posterior are the difference to the maximal values for models BC1 and C1, respectively.

More »

Fig 6 Expand

Fig 7.

Inferred changes of the IFR.

We show data for model variants BC0 (blue) and BC1 (orange, time-dependent), for four different age groups (indicated in square brackets). The thick lines represent the IFR determined from the MAP parameters, the thin lines correspond to 100 samples of the parameters for the IFR drawn from the Gaussian approximation of the posterior.

More »

Fig 7 Expand