Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

< Back to Article

Fig 1.

SAE tire axis coordinate system.

More »

Fig 1 Expand

Fig 2.

Inputs and outputs of TM-easy tire model [7].

More »

Fig 2 Expand

Fig 3.

Generalized tire parameters [6].

More »

Fig 3 Expand

Fig 4.

Response of tire force to slip [6].

More »

Fig 4 Expand

Fig 5.

Four-wheel SSV dynamic model [6].

More »

Fig 5 Expand

Table 1.

Parameters of P-3AT robots for displaced CG.

More »

Table 1 Expand

Table 2.

Tire model parameters for μx = 0.5 and μy = 0.4.

More »

Table 2 Expand

Table 3.

Tire model parameters for μx = 0.4 and μy = 0.2.

More »

Table 3 Expand

Table 4.

Tire model parameters for μx = 0.6 and μy = 0.4.

More »

Table 4 Expand

Table 5.

Tire model parameters for μx = 0.7 and μy = 0.5.

More »

Table 5 Expand

Table 6.

Tire model parameters for μx = 0.9 and μy = 0.5.

More »

Table 6 Expand

Table 7.

Tire model parameters for μx = 0.3 and μy = 0.2.

More »

Table 7 Expand

Fig 6.

Block diagram of four-wheel SSV.

More »

Fig 6 Expand

Fig 7.

Proposed control architecture.

More »

Fig 7 Expand

Fig 8.

Fuzzy membership function for yaw with .

More »

Fig 8 Expand

Fig 9.

Fuzzy membership functions for yaw with Δρu.

More »

Fig 9 Expand

Fig 10.

Fuzzy membership function for the longitudinal velocity with s.

More »

Fig 10 Expand

Fig 11.

Fuzzy membership functions for longitudinal velocity with Δρθ.

More »

Fig 11 Expand

Table 8.

Gains of SMC.

More »

Table 8 Expand

Fig 12.

Yaw tracking comparison.

More »

Fig 12 Expand

Fig 13.

Longitudinal velocity tracking comparison.

More »

Fig 13 Expand

Fig 14.

Comparison of yaw errors in case of SMC, FSMC and fractional FSMC.

More »

Fig 14 Expand

Fig 15.

Comparison of velocity errors in case of SMC FSMC and fractional FSMC.

More »

Fig 15 Expand

Table 9.

Yaw and velocity errors comparison.

More »

Table 9 Expand

Fig 16.

Control torque response generated by SMC, FSMC and fractional FSMC based laws.

More »

Fig 16 Expand

Fig 17.

Yaw control torque response generated by SMC, FSMC and fractional FSMC based laws.

More »

Fig 17 Expand

Fig 18.

Velocity control torque response generated by SMC, FSMC and fractional FSMC based laws.

More »

Fig 18 Expand

Fig 19.

Yaw tracking comparison with ramp yaw rate as reference trajectory.

More »

Fig 19 Expand

Fig 20.

Comparison of yaw errors in case of SMC, FSMC and fractional FSMC under ramp yaw rate as reference.

More »

Fig 20 Expand

Fig 21.

Comparison of yaw torque in case of SMC, FSMC and fractional FSMC under ramp yaw rate as reference.

More »

Fig 21 Expand

Fig 22.

Longitudinal velocity tracking comparison under ramp yaw rate as reference.

More »

Fig 22 Expand

Fig 23.

Longitudinal velocity error tracking comparison under ramp yaw rate as reference.

More »

Fig 23 Expand

Fig 24.

Longitudinal velocity torque comparison under ramp yaw rate as reference.

More »

Fig 24 Expand

Table 10.

Yaw and velocity errors comparison with ramp yaw rate as reference.

More »

Table 10 Expand

Fig 25.

Velocity error at different coefficient of friction.

More »

Fig 25 Expand

Fig 26.

Yaw control error at different coefficient of friction.

More »

Fig 26 Expand

Table 11.

Maximum yaw and velocity control errors at different friction coefficient for FSMC scheme.

More »

Table 11 Expand

Fig 27.

Control torque time response for SMC, FSMC and fractional FSMC.

More »

Fig 27 Expand

Fig 28.

Velocity control torque time response for SMC, FSMC and fractional FSMC.

More »

Fig 28 Expand

Fig 29.

Yaw control torque time response for SMC, FSMC and fractional FSMC.

More »

Fig 29 Expand