Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

< Back to Article

Fig 1.

Destruction of power facilities in the Wenchuan earthquake.

More »

Fig 1 Expand

Fig 2.

Flowchart of seismic damage assessment of substation.

More »

Fig 2 Expand

Fig 3.

Finite element model of 750 kV main transformer and key vulnerability parameters (① the top displacement of the high-voltage bushing Ug; ② the maximum bending stress at the root of the high-voltage bushing Sg; ③ the top displacement of the medium-voltage bushing Uz; ④ the maximum bending stress at the root of the medium-voltage bushing Sz).

More »

Fig 3 Expand

Table 1.

Parameters of 750 kV main transformer.

More »

Table 1 Expand

Table 2.

Four limit states of 750 kV main transformer.

More »

Table 2 Expand

Table 3.

Parameter values of limit states of 750 kV main transformer.

More »

Table 3 Expand

Table 4.

Selection principle of ground motion records.

More »

Table 4 Expand

Table 5.

Pieces of information related to ground motion records.

More »

Table 5 Expand

Table 6.

Criterion for earthquake amplitude modulation.

More »

Table 6 Expand

Fig 4.

Incremental dynamic analysis (IDA) of key vulnerable parameters.

(a) IDA of Ug. (b) IDA of Sg. (c) IDA of Uz. (d) IDA of Sz.

More »

Fig 4 Expand

Table 7.

Logarithmic standard deviation of each key vulnerable parameter.

More »

Table 7 Expand

Fig 5.

Vulnerability models of four key vulnerable parameters.

(a) Vulnerability of Ug. (b) Vulnerability of Sg. (c) Vulnerability of Uz. (d) Vulnerability of Sz.

More »

Fig 5 Expand

Fig 6.

Vulnerability model of 750 kV main transformer.

(a) Upper boundary. (b) Lower boundary.

More »

Fig 6 Expand

Fig 7.

Classification of power facilities in substation.

More »

Fig 7 Expand

Table 8.

Earthquake safety risk assessment of substations-weights (F) of assessment items.

More »

Table 8 Expand

Fig 8.

Vulnerability model of 750 kV substations.

(a) Upper boundary. (b) Lower boundary.

More »

Fig 8 Expand

Fig 9.

Vulnerability model of 220 kV substations.

(a) Upper boundary. (b) Lower boundary.

More »

Fig 9 Expand

Fig 10.

Vulnerability model of 110 kV substations.

(a) Upper boundary. (b) Lower boundary.

More »

Fig 10 Expand

Fig 11.

Historical seismic information and seismic observation stations of the Wuqia-Kashgar area.

(a) Earthquake catalogue. (b) Seismic observation station.

More »

Fig 11 Expand

Fig 12.

Intensity distribution of the 2008 Wuqia MS 6.8 earthquake.

More »

Fig 12 Expand

Table 9.

Complete ground motion records of each station.

More »

Table 9 Expand

Fig 13.

Distribution of substations in Wuqia-Kashgar area.

More »

Fig 13 Expand

Fig 14.

Magnitude-cumulative frequency curve.

More »

Fig 14 Expand

Fig 15.

Peak ground acceleration (PGA) distribution of the Wuqia-Kashgar area (assumed earthquake).

More »

Fig 15 Expand

Fig 16.

Probability for four seismic damage states of substations.

More »

Fig 16 Expand