Table 1.
Demographic and disease characteristics.
Table 2.
The IPQ-R, HADS and MSIS-29 descriptive statistics.
Table 3.
Pearson correlation coefficients between IPQ-R subscales, age and medical characteristics of MS.
Table 4.
Pearson correlation coefficients between IPQ-R subscales, HADS (depression and anxiety) and MSIS-29 with subscales (quality of life, physical QoL and psychological QoL).
Fig 1.
Standard means of clusters distinguished in cluster analysis for illness representation in T1 AIP (n = 30), RIP (n = 33) and FIP (n = 27).
Table 5.
Mean values of illness perception components in the individual clusters.
Table 6.
Comparisons of aspects of adaptation between AIP, RIP and FIP clusters.
Fig 2.
Cross-lagged panel model of MSIS-29 and HADS over four timepoints for AIP (n = 30).
Note: Solid arrows are p < .05; dashed arrows are nonsignificant; numbers above arrows indicate standardized coefficients.
Fig 3.
Cross-lagged panel model of MSIS-29 and HADS over four timepoints for RIP (n = 33).
Note: Solid arrows are p < .05; dashed arrows are nonsignificant; numbers above arrows indicate standardized coefficients.
Fig 4.
Cross-lagged panel model of MSIS-29 and HADS over four timepoints for FIP (n = 27).
Note: Solid arrows are p < .05; dashed arrows are nonsignificant; numbers above arrows indicate standardized coefficients.