Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

< Back to Article

Fig 1.

Samples included in the analysis.

The figure shows the process used to select samples for analysis. Abbreviations: N: number; PC: Population Cohort; PC12: study visit in HPTN 071 (PopART) after 12 months of study intervention; PC24: study visit in HPTN 071 (PopART) after 24 months of study intervention; VL: viral load; BioRad: JHU BioRad-Avidity assay; LAg: LAg-Avidity assay; NSC: non-seroconverter; SC: seroconverter.

More »

Fig 1 Expand

Table 1.

Multi-assay algorithms evaluated in this report.

More »

Table 1 Expand

Table 2.

Performance of multi-assay algorithms for identifying persons infected less than one year as recently infected.

More »

Table 2 Expand

Fig 2.

Comparison of the subsets of seroconverters identified as recently infected using four MAAs.

The Venn diagram shows the number of seroconverters who were classified as recently infected using one or more of the four MAAs. Thirty-two of the 220 seroconverters (15%) were classified as recently infected by all four MAAs. Abbreviations: LAg: limiting antigen assay, MAA: multi-assay algorithm.

More »

Fig 2 Expand

Table 3.

Serologic assay results for viremic seroconverters vs. seroconverters who were virally suppressed on ART.

More »

Table 3 Expand

Table 4.

Serologic assay results for seroconverters who were virally suppressed on ART vs. seroconverters with natural viral suppression.

More »

Table 4 Expand