Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

< Back to Article

Table 1.

Characteristics of the study sample (N = 345).

More »

Table 1 Expand

Table 2.

Global tests of homogeneity and differential item functioning for the three field work experience scales.

More »

Table 2 Expand

Table 3.

Item parametersa for items in the three field work experience scales.

More »

Table 3 Expand

Fig 1.

Item maps with distributions of person parameter locations and information curve above item threshold locations for the three field work experience scales; Observed scale (top), Practised scale (middle), Received feedback scale (bottom).

More »

Fig 1 Expand

Table 4.

Targeting and reliability of the three field work experience scales.

More »

Table 4 Expand

Table 5.

Test of unidimensionality of the field practice experience scales.

More »

Table 5 Expand

Fig 2.

The graphical Rasch models for the three field practice experience scales: Observed scale (top), Practised scale (middle), Received feedback scale (bottom).

More »

Fig 2 Expand

Table 6.

Mean scale scores, standard deviations and 95% confidence intervals for all students and stratified by level of field practice placement (N = 345).

More »

Table 6 Expand

Table 7.

Common mean scale scores for students in collapsed groups of field practice levels (N = 345).

More »

Table 7 Expand