Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

< Back to Article

Table 1.

Participants characteristics for Studies 1, 2, and 3.

More »

Table 1 Expand

Table 2.

Ten items with highest partial non-parametric correlations with perceived socioeconomic status controlled for age and gender (N = 1929).

More »

Table 2 Expand

Fig 1.

Structure of mediation models.

Model with socioeconomic status (SES) as predictor (X). S-Scale as mediator (M), symptoms of depression as outcome (Y), as well as age and gender as control variables. Note. c = path of X to Y, without inclusion of M (total effect); a = path of X to M; b = path of M to Y; c’ = path of X to Y including M (direct effect).

More »

Fig 1 Expand

Fig 2.

Mediation model Study 2.

Standardized regression coefficients for the relationship between socioeconomic status (SES) and symptoms of depression as mediated by the S-Scale and controlled for age and gender. ***p < .001.

More »

Fig 2 Expand

Fig 3.

Mediation model Study 3.

Standardized regression coefficients for the relationship between socioeconomic status (SES) and symptoms of depression at 1-year follow-up as mediated by the S-Scale and controlled for age, gender, and depression at baseline. ***p < .001, **p < .01, *p < .05.

More »

Fig 3 Expand

Table 3.

Participant characteristics for Study 4.

More »

Table 3 Expand

Table 4.

Standardized factor loadings.

More »

Table 4 Expand

Table 5.

Bivariate correlations.

More »

Table 5 Expand

Fig 4.

Mediation model Study 4.

Standardized regression coefficients for the relationship between socioeconomic status (SES) and symptoms of depression as mediated by the S-Scale and controlled for age, gender, self-esteem, daily stressors, narcissism, and socially desirable responding ***p < .001, **p < .01.

More »

Fig 4 Expand