Fig 1.
DTS233 visual interpretation [22].
Fig 2.
The square decision node indicates the decision point between the two arms; circular chance nodes show points where two alternative events for a patients are possible [35]. Branches emanating from each chance node indicate possible events and the sum of their probabilities must equal 1; and triangular terminal nodes are at the ends of pathways and represent the outcome of interest [36]. Recommended treatments are green and incorrect treatments are red. Pathways are mutually exclusive sequences of events [35].
Table 1.
Model inputs.
Table 2.
Deterministic ICERs for healthcare delivery, societal and scenario analysis.
Fig 3.
Univariate sensitivity tornado diagram–scenario analysis: Societal perspective (including cost of AMR).
Table 3.
Univariate sensitivity analysis–scenario analysis: Societal perspective (including cost of AMR).
Fig 4.
Probabilistic sensitivity analysis (health sector perspective): Scatter plot of incremental health sector cost and incremental effect resulting from replacing current clinical practice by POCCRP testing.
Fig 5.
Probabilistic sensitivity analysis (societal perspective): Scatter plot of incremental health sector cost and incremental effect resulting from replacing current clinical practice by POCCRP testing.
Fig 6.
Probabilistic sensitivity analysis (scenario analysis—societal perspective including economic cost of AMR): Scatter plot of incremental health sector cost and incremental effect resulting from replacing current clinical practice by POCCRP testing.
Fig 7.
Cost-effectiveness acceptability curves.