Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

< Back to Article

Fig 1.

3-Dimensional rendering of the head protection prototype device (HPPD).

The rendering excludes the cranium model and the elastic fabric bands. Grey represents HPPD. Beige represents cutaneous model. (Image courtesy of AuMed, Singapore). Anterior (left image), Right lateral (centre image), Top (right image).

More »

Fig 1 Expand

Fig 2.

Subject recruitment flow diagram.

More »

Fig 2 Expand

Table 1.

Baseline individual demographic, clinical and HPPD characteristics (N = 10).

More »

Table 1 Expand

Table 2.

Summary of baseline demographic, clinical and HPPD characteristics.

More »

Table 2 Expand

Table 3.

Changes in total, motor and cognitive FIM between admission and discharge.

More »

Table 3 Expand

Fig 3.

Subject pre and post head protection prototype device (HPPD) fitting showing anterior (left) and right lateral (right) views.

More »

Fig 3 Expand

Fig 4.

Individual and group wearing time (hours/day) by time point (weeks).

Subjects 1,4,5,6,7,8,9 completed 8 weeks FU. Subject 2 dropped out at week 4 FU. Subjects 3, 10 received cranioplasties prior to week 8 FU. Subject 5, who was institutionalized after week 2 FU had no assistance to don HPPD. The average wearing time was computed based on complete data available (N = 6).

More »

Fig 4 Expand

Fig 5.

Individual and group cosmesis rating (0–10) by time point (weeks).

Subjects 1,4,5,6,7,8,9 completed 8 weeks FU. Subject 2 dropped out at week 4 FU. Subjects 3, 10 received cranioplasties prior to week 8 FU. Subject 5, institutionalized after week 2 FU had no assistance to don HPPD. The average wearing time was computed based on complete data available (N = 6).

More »

Fig 5 Expand

Table 4.

Summary of types and number of reported adverse events (N = 10).

More »

Table 4 Expand