Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

< Back to Article

Fig 1.

(A) Year-wise number of mHealth apps uploaded in the google play, and (B) Smart phone penetration in the last five years, and (C) Pie chart shows various categories of apps in percentage.

More »

Fig 1 Expand

Table 1.

Various mHealth app rating scale.

More »

Table 1 Expand

Fig 2.

Factors affecting mobile app review.

More »

Fig 2 Expand

Fig 3.

Relationship between input parameters and model parameters.

More »

Fig 3 Expand

Fig 4.

Flow diagram for opinion mining.

More »

Fig 4 Expand

Fig 5.

Word cloud for Polarity of words found in the comments of selected apps– (A) positive polarity words, and (B) negative polarity words.

More »

Fig 5 Expand

Fig 6.

Calculation of clinical approval value.

More »

Fig 6 Expand

Fig 7.

Fuzzy logic based fusion technique which combines the knowledge extracted from the users’ star rating, users’ text review, clinical approval, UI design, functionality and security & privacy and thereby generates a score.

More »

Fig 7 Expand

Fig 8.

Input membership and relation between the input-output in the rule base system.

More »

Fig 8 Expand

Fig 9.

Case study design and app selection flowchart.

More »

Fig 9 Expand

Fig 10.

Correlation matrix illustrating the coefficient among factors considered for the assessment of the app scale.

More »

Fig 10 Expand

Fig 11.

Comparison of traditional mobile app ratings and fuzzy based app ratings.

(A) Average scores with respect to each parameter for all the selected 43 apps, (B) Box plot for the average rated value for traditional, fuzzy based ratings, as well as ratings based on expert opinion, (C) app scores for traditional and fuzzy based ratings for all the selected apps, and (D) Comparison of various app scales in terms of ICC.

More »

Fig 11 Expand