Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

< Back to Article

Fig 1.

Components affecting the innovation capabilities of organisations (Original work based on Hynes, Mickahail [54]).

More »

Fig 1 Expand

Fig 2.

Main components of the original research.

More »

Fig 2 Expand

Fig 3.

Cameron’s and Quinn’s organisational culture profile diagram.

More »

Fig 3 Expand

Fig 4.

Mean culture profiles for each area in the selected countries.

Areas: general characteristics of the organisation (I), leadership style (II), personnel management style (III), organisation integrity (IV), key areas in the organisation (V), success criteria (VI). Profile: Clan (C), Adhocracy (A), Market (M), Hierarchy (H).

More »

Fig 4 Expand

Fig 5.

Mean organisational culture profiles in the selected countries.

Areas: general characteristics of the organisation (I), leadership style (II), personnel management style (III), organisation integrity (IV), key areas in the organisation (V), success criteria (VI). Profile: Clan (C), Adhocracy (A), Market (M), Hierarchy (H).

More »

Fig 5 Expand

Fig 6.

Type of culture favouring innovation and areas where innovation was introduced from 2015 to 2019 in the selected countries.

More »

Fig 6 Expand

Table 1.

Ranking lists of measures to promote innovation-friendly organisational culture at universities.

More »

Table 1 Expand

Table 2.

Results of Spearman’s rho correlation coefficient and Kendall’s W concordance coefficient significance tests (p-value) for the ranking lists of actions contributing to innovation-friendly organisational culture.

More »

Table 2 Expand

Table 3.

Does organisational culture affect innovation at universities and do formalisation and hierarchy make it difficult?

More »

Table 3 Expand

Fig 7.

A model of how innovation-friendly organisational culture is formed at universities.

More »

Fig 7 Expand