Table 1.
Contingency table for agreement between the bookmark procedure (BM) and constrained Mixture Rasch Model (cMRM).
Table 2.
Agreement measures.
Fig 1.
Scree plots for information criteria in different samples.
Fig 2.
Response probability profile of “correct answer” for 4-class solution among the split-half student samples.
Fig 3.
Response probability profile of “correct answer” for 3-class solution among the adult samples.
Fig 4.
Distributions of the latent classes on reading score (WLE) in different samples.
Boxplots in Fig 4A to 4D display the class-specific reading competence distribution for the different samples. Frequency polygons in Fig 4E to 4H display the class-specific reading ability distribution and frequency for the different samples. The dashed vertical lines mark the cut scores for the Bookmark procedure.
Table 3.
Percentage of individuals within the low-literacy group.
Table 4.
Contingency table for agreement between the bookmark procedure (BM) and constrained Mixture Rasch Model (cMRM) in different samples.
Table 5.
Measures for agreement between the bookmark procedure (BM) and constrained Mixture Rasch Model (cMRM) in different samples.