Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

< Back to Article

Fig 1.

PRISMA flow diagram.

More »

Fig 1 Expand

Table 1A.

Characteristics of trials contributing to the Reusable Menstrual Pad review (alphabetical order).

More »

Table 1A Expand

Table 1B.

Characteristics of cohort studies contributing to the Reusable Menstrual Pad review (alphabetical order).

More »

Table 1B Expand

Table 1C.

Characteristics of surveys contributing to the Reusable Menstrual Pad review (alphabetical order).

More »

Table 1C Expand

Fig 2.

Use of reusable pads in surveys or at enrolment in a cohort, 2011–2019.

*According to the website, Bidibidi camp received reusable pads in August 2017 [57]. However, Lenia 2019 described that both reusable and disposable pads were distributed [53].

More »

Fig 2 Expand

Fig 3.

Uptake of reusable pads in cohort studies in middle- and low-income countries, 2014–2019.

DFG: Days for Girls. IFRC: International Federation of Red Cross and Red Crescent Societies.

More »

Fig 3 Expand

Table 2.

Uptake of reusable menstrual pads in cohort studies.

More »

Table 2 Expand

Table 3.

Information on leaking, mobility and odour when using reusable menstrual pad.

More »

Table 3 Expand

Table 4.

Information on washing, drying and changing of reusable menstrual pad.

More »

Table 4 Expand

Table 5.

Any information that may relate to adverse effects of reusable menstrual pads.

More »

Table 5 Expand