Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

< Back to Article

Fig 1.

Study area (thick dashed line) context map in Greater Melbourne.

Orange dots indicate sensor locations. Inset rectangle delineates the area covered in Figs 4 and 5. Wikimedia base map accessed under Open Data Commons Open Database License (ODbL), created by OpenStreetMap contributors.

More »

Fig 1 Expand

Table 1.

Change in built environment in Melbourne CBD, 2014–2018.

(Source: City of Melbourne 2021).

More »

Table 1 Expand

Table 2.

Descriptive statistics of June weekday pedestrian counts from 32 sensors that were consistently active from 2014–2018 during AM, lunch, and PM periods.

(Source: City of Melbourne 2020).

More »

Table 2 Expand

Fig 2.

Betweenness results for street segments for a single origin-destination pair, where the origin has a weight of “100” (of which only 20.2 are routed due to a distance decay effect) along all routes that are up to 15% longer than the shortest path.

More »

Fig 2 Expand

Fig 3.

Potential 36 origin-destination pairs for pedestrian trips in Melbourne.

Gray highlights include the ten O-D pairs for which trips were modeled. Weights describe which attribute was used as origin or destination weight in the analysis.

More »

Fig 3 Expand

Table 3.

Goodness of fit results of MLM and the chosen SVR model for 10 types of pedestrian flows combined with weather and day-of-week variables, with sensor-level dummies.

Left: calibration results on June 2014 data. Right: prediction results on June 2015 data.

More »

Table 3 Expand

Table 4.

Evaluating impact of built-environment measures on prediction with sensor dummies (left) and without (right).

Prediction metrics for 2015 using a model calibrated on 2014 are presented.

More »

Table 4 Expand

Fig 4.

Predicted pedestrian flows during a typical workday AM peak period (8.00–9.00AM) in June 2015, based on June 2014 calibration.

More »

Fig 4 Expand

Fig 5.

Predicted change in pedestrian flows during a typical workday AM peak period (8.00–9.00AM) in between June 2014 and 2015.

More »

Fig 5 Expand

Fig 6.

Effect of pedestrian flow measures on model predictions without sensor-level dummies during AM peak, Lunch peak, and PM peak.

More »

Fig 6 Expand

Table 5.

Examining stability of model prediction performance without sensor-level dummies over time (using RMSE).

More »

Table 5 Expand

Fig 7.

Stability of feature importance from 2014–2019 for AM, lunch and PM peak periods (without sensor-level dummies).

More »

Fig 7 Expand