Table 1.
Review of articles published in the last 5 years on digital competence 1) with a systematic review (SR), 2) covering higher education (HE), and 3) addressing digital competence evaluation (DCE).
Table 2.
Reliability and validity assessments for quantitative instruments.
Table 3.
Results of the search in the considered databases.
Fig 1.
Study selection process.
Table 4.
Template used for data extraction.
Fig 2.
Process for ranking and characterizing studies’ reporting practices.
Fig 3.
Demographic and methodological features of the studies.
Fig 4.
Reporting practices of quality assessments.
Table 5.
Studies ranked by their Relative Closeness to the ideal study in terms of reporting practices of quality assessments.
Table 6.
Distribution of studies according to their reporting practice and level of dissemination.
Table 7.
Pearson’s Chi-squared tests of independence between Reporting Practice and demographic and methodological variables.
Table 8.
Standardized residuals from post hoc analyses on Pearson’s Chi-squared test.
Fig 5.
Predicted probabilities from an ordinal regression model with Reporting Practice as a function of year.
The shaded ribbons correspond to the 95% confidence interval of the predicted values.