Table 1.
Scan parameters of subjects in each group.
Fig 1.
Number of CT examination enrolled in this study and divided into subgroups on the basis of water-equivalent diameter(Dw), with exclusion criteria.
Table 2.
Patient characteristics.
Fig 2.
Scatter plots of CTDIvol, SSDE and Dw.
The CTDIvol and SSDE increased as function of Dw.
Fig 3.
Comparison of CTDIvol, DLP, and SSDE among different size groups.
The CTDIvol was smaller than SSDE in each subgroups.
Table 3.
CTDIvol, DLP, and SSDE analysis among subgroups, and comparison CTDIvol and SSDE between groups.
Table 4.
Comparison between CTDIvol and DLP in our study with China DRLs.
Fig 4.
CTDIvol, DLP, and SSDE in our study were all lower than the 50th and 75th percentiles of the ACR DRLs among groups.
Table 5.
The mean values of CTDIvol, DLP, SSDE in our study and mean values of 50th percentile and 75th percentile of ACR DRLs.
Table 6.
Comparison of the CTDIvol, DLP, and SSDE with the 50th and 75th percentiles of ACR DRLs.