Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

< Back to Article

Table 1.

Literature review of PHES in healthy participants.

More »

Table 1 Expand

Table 2.

Literature review of PHES in patients.

More »

Table 2 Expand

Table 3.

Characteristics of healthy participants.

More »

Table 3 Expand

Fig 1.

Effect of age on PHES.

Plots of (A) correct responses in Digit Symbol Test (DST), time in seconds in (B) Number Connection Test part A (NCT-A), (C) NCT-B, (D) Serial Dotting Test (SDT), (E) Line Tracing Test (LTTt), and (F) errors in LLT (LTTe) on the y axis as a function of age levels on the x axis in years. Education is also illustrated in (E). Asterisks indicate significant statistical differences in Newman-Keuls post-hoc test: *, P < .05; **, P < .01.

More »

Fig 1 Expand

Fig 2.

Analysis of regression outliers.

Regression plots of (A) standardized residuals as a function of case numbers, (B) Mahalanobis distances, (C) deleted residuals as a function of raw residuals, and (D) expected normal values as a function of residuals, illustrated here in the Number Connection Test part B (NCT-B).

More »

Fig 2 Expand

Fig 3.

Comparison between French and seminal German norms.

Correlation scatterplots of (A) correct responses in Digit Symbol Test (DST), time in seconds in (B) Number Connection Test part A (NCT-A), (C) NCT-B, (D) Serial Dotting Test (SDT), (E) Line Tracing Test (LTTt), and (F) errors in LLT (LTTe) of French (f) participants on y axis as a function of German (g) participants on x axis. Subtitles are regression equations.

More »

Fig 3 Expand

Table 4.

Relationship between French and seminal German norms.

More »

Table 4 Expand