Table 1.
Characteristics of online respondents in the study.
Table 2.
Details of the items, constructs and the corresponding questions’ mean marks of each question, construct, and overall score (N = 253) based on the initial questionnaire development categories of risk perception, attitude, and practice.
Table 3.
Results of EFA and reliability analysis of all 35 items with respective factor loadings, ITC, and domain-specific Cronbach α, as well as McDonald’s omega.
Fig 1.
Path analysis of the confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) showing standardised estimates of the correlations (figures on the arrows) between the five domains (ellipse), the 31 items (rectangle).
(P.Sev = Perceived Severity; P.Bar = Perceived Barrier; SE = Self-Efficacy; CTA = Cues-to-action; P.Sus = Perceived Susceptibility; P.Ben = Perceived Benefit; Pr-In = Practice Inside the housing compoung; Pr-Ot = Practice Outside the house compound namely the neighbourhood).
Table 4.
Result of MSV, AVE, CR, and fitness of the model obtained from CFA.
Table 5.
Result from item response theory (IRT).
Fig 2.
Probability curves for Likert scale.