Table 1.
Characteristics and descriptive data of respondents and intensive care units.
Fig 1.
Joints assessed for passive limb range of motion reported by the 33 respondents.
Fig 2.
Frequency and duration of performing passive range of motion assessment reported by the 33 respondents.
Table 2.
Rankings awarded by respondents based on the importance of the aims of passive limb range of motion exercises.
Table 3.
Rankings awarded by respondents based on the importance of the use of passive range of motion techniques/modalities.
Fig 3.
Frequencies for the incidence, magnitude of the problem, and management in relation to loss of passive limb range of motion/contracture reported by the 33 respondents.
Table 4.
Rankings awarded by respondents for the problems that resulted from loss of passive limb range of motion/contracture.
Fig 4.
Frequencies for predisposing factors for loss of passive limb range of motion reported by the 33 respondents.
Table 5.
Rankings awarded by respondents for the influence of selected factors on respondents’ physiotherapy practice with respect to passive limb range of motion.