Table 1.
Land use and land cover classes.
Fig 1.
Schematic representation of the development of regional land use and land cover scenarios.
Shared Socioeconomic Pathways (SSPs) and Representative Concentration Pathway (RCPs).
Table 2.
Synthesis of core premises differentiating the SSPs in relation to land use.
Source: Popp et al. [29].
Table 3.
Detailed regional assumptions related to Sustainable development scenario, middle of the road, and strong inequality scenario.
Fig 2.
Representation of LuccMEBR scenarios.
Table 4.
Land demand parameters.
Fig 3.
Representation of the factors integration into the cellular space.
a) Hydroelectric plants, b) Protected areas, c) Federal and State highways, and d) Proportion of large agricultural establishments. The source of States boundaries is according to IBGE [31].
Fig 4.
Percentage of forest vegetation, grassland vegetation and pasture planted observed versus simulated in 10 x 10 km² cells in 2014 and the spatial distribution of errors of omission and commission.
The source of States boundaries is according to IBGE [31].
Fig 5.
Percentage of Agriculture, Mosaic of occupation and Forestry observed versus simulated in 10 x 10 km² cells in 2014 and the spatial distribution of errors of omission and commission.
The source of States boundaries is according to IBGE [31].
Table 5.
Percentage of spatial adjustment and errors.
Fig 6.
Spatial distribution of areas and land use according to the scenarios from 2000 to 2050.
The source of States boundaries is according to IBGE [31].
Table 6.
The direction of change in land use and coverage, according to classes and scenarios between 2000 and 2050.
↗ = Increase and ↘ = Reduction.