Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

< Back to Article

Table 1.

Estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) equations.

More »

Table 1 Expand

Fig 1.

Flowchart of exclusion criteria.

More »

Fig 1 Expand

Table 2.

Cohort characteristics, stratified by ethnicity.

More »

Table 2 Expand

Fig 2.

Density plots of GFR measurements, stratified by ethnicity.

(A) mGFR, (B) eGFR FAS equation, (C) eGFR LM Revised equation, (D) eGFR EKFC equation, (E) eGFR CKD-EPI adjusted for ethnicity correction factor, (F) eGFR CKD-EPI unadjusted for ethnicity, (G) eGFR MDRD adjusted, and (H) eGFR MDRD unadjusted.

More »

Fig 2 Expand

Fig 3.

Density plots of the bias between each eGFR equation and mGFR, stratified by ethnicity.

(A) eGFR CKD-EPI adjusted for ethnicity correction factor, (B) eGFR CKD-EPI unadjusted for ethnicity, (C) eGFR MDRD adjusted, (D) eGFR MDRD unadjusted, (E) eGFR FAS equation, (F) eGFR LM Revised equation, (G) eGFR EKFC equation.

More »

Fig 3 Expand

Table 3.

Estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) equations bias, precision and accuracy compared with mGFR, stratified by ethnicity.

More »

Table 3 Expand

Fig 4.

Bland-Altman plots for eGFR equations compared to mGFR, stratified by ethnicity.

(White, Black) participants: (A, H) adjusted CKD-EPI, (B, I) unadjusted CKD-EPI, (C, J) adjusted MDRD, (D, K) unadjusted MDRD, (E, L) FAS, (F, M) LM Revised, (G, N) EKFC. x-axes show the mean between the mGFR and eGFR measurements ([mGFR+eGFR]/2) and y-axes show the differences between the mGFR and eGFR measurements. Units: ml/min/1.73m2. The central dashed line represents bias, and the dashed lines above and below represent the 95% limits of agreement.

More »

Fig 4 Expand

Table 4.

Regression analysis for the association between ethnicity and mGFR to identify an ethnicity correction factor for our study sample, adjusted for age, sex and log(SCr).

More »

Table 4 Expand

Table 5.

Linear regression analysis for the association between log(SCr) and ethnicity, adjusted for mGFR, age and sex.

More »

Table 5 Expand

Table 6.

Linear regression analysis for the association between the bias of CKD-EPI and MDRD equations and demographic characteristics in White participants, with mutual adjustment for all other variables in the table.

N = 1614.

More »

Table 6 Expand

Table 7.

Assessment of clinical impact of chronic kidney disease staging according to Kidney Disease Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) criteria using adjusted and unadjusted CKD-EPI-GFR equation in a cohort of people of self-reported ‘Black Ethnicity’ receiving nephrology care in the United Kingdom (excluding patients receiving dialysis).

More »

Table 7 Expand

Table 8.

Studies of measured and estimated glomerular filtration rate in Africa and Europe.

More »

Table 8 Expand