Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

< Back to Article

Fig 1.

Events status.

The 1992/93 CHS population status at the end of follow-up for incident hip fracture on June 30, 2014. 76% of the study participants suffered from the competing event of death.

More »

Fig 1 Expand

Fig 2.

Hazard ratios estimates.

Contrasting the magnitudes of the hazard ratio estimates for incident hip fracture between the cause-specific and FG subdistribution approaches.

More »

Fig 2 Expand

Table 1.

Hazard ratio estimates for incident hip fracture, with mortality a competing risk.

More »

Table 1 Expand

Fig 3.

Hazard ratios estimates.

Contrasting the hazard ratio estimates for incident hip fracture between the cause-specific approach and the FG subdistribution approach. Mortality cause-specific hazard ratio estimate foretells the mutual position of the hazard ratios for incident hip fracture.

More »

Fig 3 Expand

Table 2.

Summary of CS and SD approaches.

More »

Table 2 Expand

Fig 4.

Boxplots of years at risk for incident hip fracture and mortality.

Various approaches.

More »

Fig 4 Expand

Table 3.

Incidence rate ratios and hazard ratios estimates for incident hip fracture, mortality and composite event in model M1.

More »

Table 3 Expand

Fig 5.

Estimates of cumulative incidence.

Cumulative incidence functions estimates for incident hip fracture, mortality and composite event.

More »

Fig 5 Expand

Table 4.

The comparison of hazard ratios estimates, cumulative hazard ratios estimates, relative risk estimates, and odds ratios estimates for cumulative incidence for incident hip fracture and mortality in the competing risk setting under the subdistribution approach.

More »

Table 4 Expand