Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

< Back to Article

Table 1.

Cement performance index parameters.

More »

Table 1 Expand

Table 2.

Laboratory mix ratio.

More »

Table 2 Expand

Fig 1.

MTS-810 material testing machine.

More »

Fig 1 Expand

Table 3.

Technical indexes of DS5-8A full information AE signal analyzer.

More »

Table 3 Expand

Fig 2.

Fixed position of strain gauge and sensor.

(a) Front view. (b) Side view. (c) Top view.

More »

Fig 2 Expand

Table 4.

Single-stage cyclic load for fatigue test.

More »

Table 4 Expand

Fig 3.

Typical acoustic emission burst signal.

More »

Fig 3 Expand

Table 5.

Fatigue test scheme of concrete beam.

More »

Table 5 Expand

Table 6.

Bending resistance of concrete beams.

More »

Table 6 Expand

Fig 4.

Weibull distribution test for bending fatigue life of specimens.

(a) S = 0.85. (b) S = 0.75. (c) S = 0.65.

More »

Fig 4 Expand

Table 7.

Weibull distribution test for bending fatigue life of specimens.

More »

Table 7 Expand

Table 8.

Regression parameter results.

More »

Table 8 Expand

Fig 5.

The relationship curve between fatigue life and stress level with different failure probability.

More »

Fig 5 Expand

Table 9.

Residual strength under single stage loading (failure probability P = 0.50, S = 0.85, 0.75, 0.65).

More »

Table 9 Expand

Fig 6.

Relative damage strength at different stress levels and test of evolution equation.

(a) S = 0.85. (b) S = 0.75. (c) S = 0.65.

More »

Fig 6 Expand

Table 10.

Damage evolution equation test under different stress levels.

More »

Table 10 Expand

Table 11.

Regression parameter results.

More »

Table 11 Expand

Fig 7.

Fitting curve of relative damage strength at different stress levels.

More »

Fig 7 Expand

Fig 8.

Fitting curve of strength relative damage at different stress levels.

(a) S = 0.85. (b) S = 0.75. (c) S = 0.65.

More »

Fig 8 Expand

Table 12.

Regression parameter results.

More »

Table 12 Expand

Table 13.

Test results of flexural fatigue damage of concrete under two-stage loading (high-low order).

More »

Table 13 Expand

Table 14.

Test results of flexural fatigue damage of concrete under two-stage loading (low-high order).

More »

Table 14 Expand

Table 15.

Test results of flexural fatigue damage of concrete under three-stage loading (high-low order).

More »

Table 15 Expand

Table 16.

Test results of flexural fatigue damage of concrete under three-stage loading (low-high order).

More »

Table 16 Expand

Fig 9.

Schematic diagram of fatigue damage development path.

More »

Fig 9 Expand

Table 17.

Calculation and verification of fatigue cumulative damage model.

More »

Table 17 Expand