Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

< Back to Article

Fig 1.

Examples of random transformation-based data augmentation on the OliveOil dataset.

The dotted blue lines are the original patterns and the solid red lines are the generated patterns.

More »

Fig 1 Expand

Fig 2.

Taxonomy of time series data augmentation.

More »

Fig 2 Expand

Fig 3.

The architectures of the neural networks used to evaluate the data augmentation methods.

More »

Fig 3 Expand

Table 1.

Comparative results for magnitude domain transformation-based data augmentation methods.

More »

Table 1 Expand

Table 2.

Comparative results for time domain transformation-based data augmentation methods.

More »

Table 2 Expand

Table 3.

Comparative results for pattern mixing-based data augmentation methods.

More »

Table 3 Expand

Fig 4.

Visualization of the GunPoint dataset using PCA and the compared augmentation methods.

The solid shapes are the original time series, the hollow shapes are the generated time series, and the colors indicate different classes.

More »

Fig 4 Expand

Fig 5.

Spearman’s Rank Correlation Coefficients between change in accuracy (Δ Acc) and various dataset characteristics.

The top row in red is the change in accuracy and the subsequent rows are the correlations.

More »

Fig 5 Expand

Table 4.

Algorithm comparison with average augmentation time per dataset and tunable parameters.

More »

Table 4 Expand

Table 5.

Data augmentation recommendations for data type and model type.

More »

Table 5 Expand