Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

< Back to Article

Fig 1.

Growth in the occurrence of the combination of the terms ‘public engagement’ and ‘science’ in titles or abstracts in the Web of Science from 1995–2019 (N = 517).

More »

Fig 1 Expand

Fig 2.

Top 10 academic journals among publications with a combination of the terms ‘public engagement’ and ‘science’ in their titles or abstracts in the Web of Science for the period 1995–2019.

More »

Fig 2 Expand

Table 1.

Search and selection process of academic articles.

More »

Table 1 Expand

Fig 3.

Occurrences of the term ‘engagement’ in published items in JCOM, PUS and SC in titles and/or abstracts (1993–2018; N = 284).

More »

Fig 3 Expand

Fig 4.

Country affiliations of authors in the project sample who published in PUS and SC, as captured by the Web of Science (N = 206).

More »

Fig 4 Expand

Table 2.

Primary motivations for engagement in academic literature.

More »

Table 2 Expand

Table 3.

Prominent criticisms of engagement in academic literature.

More »

Table 3 Expand

Table 4.

Democratization as motivation for engagement in policy documents.

More »

Table 4 Expand

Table 5.

Education as motivation for engagement in policy documents.

More »

Table 5 Expand

Table 6.

Legitimation as motivation for engagement in policy documents.

More »

Table 6 Expand

Table 7.

Innovation as motivation for engagement in policy documents.

More »

Table 7 Expand

Table 8.

Inspiration as motivation for engagement in policy documents.

More »

Table 8 Expand

Table 9.

Concerns mentioned in policy documents: Need for support, recognition and reward.

More »

Table 9 Expand

Table 10.

Criticisms in policy documents: Scientists’ lack of preparedness.

More »

Table 10 Expand