Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

< Back to Article

Table 1.

Conceptual framework for data synthesis [21].

More »

Table 1 Expand

Fig 1.

Flow diagram on the selection of systematic reviews.

More »

Fig 1 Expand

Table 2.

A. Characteristics of included systematic reviews: Undergraduate (UG) and postgraduate (PG), reviews shaded in grey were newly identified. B. Characteristics of included systematic reviews: Postgraduate (PG) and continuing professional development in healthcare professionals (HCPs). Studies shaded in grey were newly identified.

More »

Table 2 Expand

Fig 2.

Methodological quality of all reviews included in the update of the overview using AMSTAR 2 tool.

More »

Fig 2 Expand

Fig 3.

Summary of source studies included in the systematic reviews.

A–attitudes, B–behaviour, BA–before and after study, CBA–controlled before and after study, CRCT- cluster RCT, CT- controlled trial, HP–health professionals, I–interns, K -knowledge, MI–multiple intervention, NRCT–nonrandomised controlled trial, P–practice, Qual–qualitative study, R–residents, RCT–randomised controlled trial, S–skills, SI–single intervention, UG–undergraduates.

More »

Fig 3 Expand

Table 3.

A. Review level findings: Intervention vs no intervention (22 reviews–some of the reviews are shown in more than one population if separate data were provided). B. Review level findings: Intervention vs other intervention (5 reviews).

More »

Table 3 Expand

Fig 4.

Illustrative display of the likely impact of different teaching approaches at different medical education levels–summary from RCT.

HP–health professionals, I–interns, R–residents, RCT- randomised controlled trial, UG–undergraduates; Explanation of the coloured symbols used are provided on the figure.

More »

Fig 4 Expand

Fig 5.

Illustrative display of the likely impact of different teaching approaches at different medical education levels–summary from non-RCT.

CT–controlled trial, HP–health professionals, I–interns, MI–multiple intervention, non-RCT–non-randomised study, Qual–qualitative study, R–residents, SI–single intervention, UG–undergraduates; Explanation of the coloured symbols used are provided on the figure.

More »

Fig 5 Expand

Fig 6.

Illustrative display of the likely impact of different teaching approaches at different medical education levels–summary from other study designs (i.e., before-after, qualitative studies).

BA–before and after study, CBA–controlled before and after study, HP–health professionals, R–residents, UG–undergraduates; Explanation of the coloured symbols used are provided on the figure.

More »

Fig 6 Expand