Table 1.
Detailed information of fungal taxa used in the phylogenetic analyses.
The newly generated sequences are indicated in blue, and the ex-type strains are in bold.
Fig 1.
Maximum likelihood tree based on a combined LSU, RPB1 and ITS sequence matrix for taxa in Magnaporthales.
Bootstrap support values for ML equal to or higher than 70% and the Bayesian posterior probabilities equal to or higher than 0.90 PP are defined above the nodes as ML/PP. Ex-type strains are in black bold, and new species and new combinations are indicated in red bold.
Fig 2.
Ophioceras sichuanense (KUN-HKAS 107677, holotype).
a, b Pseudostromata with long ostiolar necks on host. c–e Section through pseudostromata. f Ascoma. g Ostiole. h Apical part of neck. i Peridium. j–l Asci. m Ascospores. n Paraphyses. Scale bars: d, e = 200 μm, f–h = 50 μm, i = 30 μm, j–n = 20 μm.
Table 2.
Synopsis of Ophioceras species.
Fig 3.
Ophioceras castillensis (redrawn from Huhndorf et al. [8], NY isotype).
a, b Ascomata. c Ascus. d Apical ring. e Ascospores. f Peridium. g Paraphyses. Scale bars: a = 1 mm, b = 200 μm, f = 20 μm, c, e, g = 10 μm, d = 5 μm.
Fig 4.
Ophioceras rhizomorpha (redrawn from Huhndorf et al. [8], all from Mugambi 1262).
a Ascomata and synnemata on the substrate. b Ascoma. c Peridium. d Ascus. e Apical ring. f Hyaline to pale brown ascospores. g Paraphyses. h, i Conidiophores. j Conidiogenous cell bearing conidium. k Conidium. Scale bars: a = 1 mm, b = 300 μm, c = 50 μm, g = 30 μm, d = 20 μm, i, k = 15 μm, f, h, j = 10 μm, e = 5 μm.
Table 3.
Morphological comparisons of similar genera to Ophioceras.