Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

< Back to Article

Fig 1.

Timeline of study assessments.

Short-term and long-term periods are defined to determine whether concern about falling at the start of such a period is predictive for falling within such a period and whether falling within such a period is predictive of having increased concern about falling at the end of that period compared to the start of that period. At baseline, a participant’s first assessment, participants reported any falls they had experienced in the previous year and physical activity during one-week, age and gender were recorded.

More »

Fig 1 Expand

Fig 2.

Progression of concern about falling before and after a fall.

Distribution of FES-I scores per month are displayed in dark grey relative to the months in between which the participant experienced his or her first fall (area indicated in light gray) (-1 = last monthly questionnaire before the fall, +1 = first monthly questionnaire after the fall). Diamonds and solid line represent the mean FES-I scores and the progression of these mean FES-I scores, respectively. The dark grey areas represent the distribution of FES-I scores per month. The upper figure displays FES-I progression before and after any type of fall. The lower figure displays FES-I progression before and after an injurious fall. FES-I scores of people who fell more than once are only included until the first monthly questionnaire after the first fall. Sample size (N) is indicated for each month.

More »

Fig 2 Expand

Table 1.

Participant characteristics.

More »

Table 1 Expand

Table 2.

Relation between falling and concern about falling over long-term and short-term intervals.

More »

Table 2 Expand