Fig 1.
Data selection and processing.
(A) An overview of the meta-analysis procedure to derive the object manipulation network and its structural network construction. FEF, frontal eye fields; 6a, area 6 anterior; 6mp, area 6mp (supplementary motor area); 6d, dorsal area 6; 6r, rostral area 6; 6v, ventral premotor cortex 6; 4, primary motor cortex; 3a, area 3a; 3b, primary sensory cortex; 1, area 1; 2, area 2; PFt, PFt area; Pfop, PF opercular area; PF, PF area (Brodmann Area 40); PFm, PF Complex area; 7PC, Area 7PC; AIP, anterior intraparietal area; LIPv, ventral lateral intraparietal area; MIP, medial intraparietal Area; TPOJ1, temporo-parieto-occipital junction 1 area; TPOJ2, temporo-parieto-occipital junction 2 area; TE1p, posterior TE1 area; TE2p, posterior TE2 area; PHT, PHT area; PH, PH area; FST, FST area; MST, medial superior temporal Area; MT, middle temporal Area; V4t, V4t area. (B) Construction of the object manipulation network and its subnetwork regions. L, left; R, right; BEDPOSTX, Bayesian estimation of diffusion parameters obtained using sampling techniques; PROBTRACKX, probabilistic tracking with crossing fibers.
Fig 2.
Structural connectivity differences between males and females.
(A) Structural connectivity in the object manipulation network in males and females. Significant differences in node strength (B) and edge strength (C) between males and females (two-sample t-tests).
Fig 3.
Global node strength and global efficiency of structural networks in the object manipulation, parietal, ventral temporal, and motor networks.
*p < 0.05.
Fig 4.
Correlation analysis between the parietal network global node strength and grip strength in males and females.