Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

< Back to Article

Table 1.

Aetiology of the pleural effusion.

More »

Table 1 Expand

Table 2.

Results of the clinical and analytical variables.

More »

Table 2 Expand

Table 3.

Calprotectin concentration in pleural fluid according to the type of pleural effusion.

More »

Table 3 Expand

Table 4.

Diagnostic accuracy of pleural fluid calprotectin levels according to several cut-off values.

More »

Table 4 Expand

Table 5.

Frequency variables and results from the univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses.

More »

Table 5 Expand

Fig 1.

New clinical decision algorithm proposed for the urgent diagnosis of MPE using the QB®sCAL immunochromatographic method for determining calprotectin.

ADA = adenosine deaminase; LDH = lactate dehydrogenase; PF = pleural fluid; N = frequency; MPE = malignant pleural effusion.

More »

Fig 1 Expand

Fig 2.

Analytical comparison of QB®sCAL and ELISA fCAL®.

(a) Passing-Bablok linear regression of the results of calprotectin pleural fluid measurements for QB®SCAL and corresponding results for ELISA fCAL® performed in 48 patients (analytical correlation). (b) Bland-Altman difference plot for analysis of the differences between the two methods (analytical agreement).

More »

Fig 2 Expand

Table 6.

Results for calprotectin level measurements using the ELISA fCAL® method versus the QB®sCAL method.

More »

Table 6 Expand

Table 7.

Clinical agreement between the results from the ELISA fCAL® and QB® sCAL methodsa.

More »

Table 7 Expand