Table 1.
Characteristics of the thresholds for MEM (with and without 2017) and WHO ACM (with and without 2017), by the different types of waves detection methods, Mauritius, ARI season 2012–2018.
Fig 1.
Comparative analysis for the two wave/season curve of the proportion of attendance for ARI in Mauritius using MEM.
Fig 2.
Comparative analysis for the two wave/season curve of the proportion of attendance for ARI in Mauritius using WHO ACM.
Fig 3.
Time-series for the two wave/season curve of the proportion of attendance for ARI using MEM, Mauritius, season 2012–2018.
Fig 4.
Time series for the two wave curve of the proportion of attendance for ARI using WHO Average Curve Method, Mauritius, season 2012–2018.
Table 2.
Comparing the indicators of the goodness of fit model for the two wave/season curves detection methods between MEM and WHO Average Curve Method, Mauritius, ARI season 2012–2018.
Fig 5.
The weekly proportion of attendance for ARI by parameter based on intensity zone of ARI activity of World Health Organization (WHO) method and moving epidemic method (MEM), Mauritius, seasons 2012–2018.