Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

< Back to Article

Fig 1.

Flow chart of study selection process.

More »

Fig 1 Expand

Table 1.

Study and population characteristics of included studies for fracture outcome.

More »

Table 1 Expand

Table 2.

Study and population characteristics of included studies for bone mineral density outcome.

More »

Table 2 Expand

Table 3.

Study and population characteristics of included studies for bone microarchitecture outcome by peripheral quantitative computed tomography (pQCT) or high-resolution peripheral quantitative computed tomography (HR-pQCT).

More »

Table 3 Expand

Fig 2.

Forest plot of pooled effect size for the risk of fracture at any site in A) postmenopausal women, B) premenopausal women, and C) men with vs. without obesity, using a random-effect model.

More »

Fig 2 Expand

Fig 3.

Forest plot of pooled effect size for the risk of hip fracture in A) postmenopausal women and B) men with vs. without obesity, using a random-effect model.

More »

Fig 3 Expand

Fig 4.

Forest plot of pooled effect size for the total hip aBMD by DXA mean difference between A) postmenopausal women, B) premenopausal women and C) men with vs. without obesity, using a random-effect model.

More »

Fig 4 Expand