Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

< Back to Article

Fig 1.

Stress distribution of a) Non-composite section and b) Composite section (Kovach and Naito [27]).

More »

Fig 1 Expand

Fig 2.

“Push-off” specimen a) Schematic of reinforcement details, and b) Actual reinforcement.

More »

Fig 2 Expand

Fig 3.

“Push-off” test setup: a) Schematic drawing, and b) Experimental set-up.

More »

Fig 3 Expand

Fig 4.

Surface textures of the top surface of the concrete base: a) schematics and b) actual surfaces.

More »

Fig 4 Expand

Fig 5.

Surface roughness profile at the top surface of the concrete base.

More »

Fig 5 Expand

Fig 6.

FE models for the composite concrete-to-concrete specimens with various interface types.

More »

Fig 6 Expand

Fig 7.

Evolution of the boundary conditions to simulate the loading sequence.

More »

Fig 7 Expand

Table 1.

Interface properties for the composite concrete.

More »

Table 1 Expand

Table 2.

Finite element mesh densities for all models.

More »

Table 2 Expand

Fig 8.

Horizontal load–interface slip relationship under various normal stresses: σn = (a) 0 N/mm2, (b) 0.5 N/mm2, (c) 1.0 N/mm2, and (d) 1.5 N/mm2.

More »

Fig 8 Expand

Fig 9.

Peak shear loads of various interfacial conditions under different normal stresses.

More »

Fig 9 Expand

Table 3.

Interface shear strength from the experimental and modeled results.

More »

Table 3 Expand

Fig 10.

Failure mode at the interface regions.

More »

Fig 10 Expand

Fig 11.

Interface shear stress (i) evolution relationship and (ii) distribution at peak shear load.

More »

Fig 11 Expand