Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

< Back to Article

Fig 1.

Flow chart of the study.

Patients who developed a censuring event during the follow up period contributed to the study until the date of the occurrence of the censoring event.

More »

Fig 1 Expand

Table 1.

Preparation and administration of study medication.

More »

Table 1 Expand

Table 2.

Patient characteristics.

More »

Table 2 Expand

Fig 2.

Proportion of catheters free of thrombotic dysfunction.

Kaplan-Meier estimates with censoring at the time of the first thrombotic dysfunction. Population at risk during the 6 months follow up is indicated under the graph. Placebo (blue lines) and once weekly urokinase (red lines). P value of null hypothesis of no difference in survival by log-rank test = 0.01.

More »

Fig 2 Expand

Table 3.

Primary and secondary efficacy outcomes.

More »

Table 3 Expand

Table 4.

Reasons for early study termination other than refractory thrombosis.

More »

Table 4 Expand

Table 5.

Evolution of hemodialysis adequacy parameters during the 6-month study period.

More »

Table 5 Expand

Table 6.

Costs of prophylactic and therapeutic catheter locks per patient during the 6-month study period 1.

More »

Table 6 Expand