Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

< Back to Article

Table 1.

Timeline of local response to the pandemic.

More »

Table 1 Expand

Fig 1.

Predicted values of depressed affect from Year × Day × Time 1 BDI-II interaction.

Cohort 1 = 2019; cohort 2 = 2020.

More »

Fig 1 Expand

Fig 2.

Predicted values of depressive symptoms across the range of between-person problem-focused coping ratings (x-axis).

The grand mean centered coping variable, which ranged from -2 to 4, represents an individual’s relative position to the overall sample in their use of problem-focused coping over the course of the term.

More »

Fig 2 Expand

Table 2.

Psychosocial outcomes predicted by coping strategies.

More »

Table 2 Expand

Fig 3.

Predicting stress severity from fluctuations in problem-focused coping.

The centered within-person coping variable ranged from -5 to 6, reflecting an individuals’ deviation from their typical use of problem-focused coping strategies.

More »

Fig 3 Expand

Fig 4.

Heterogeneity in individuals’ levels of anxiety (reported in ESM).

Individual trajectories of anxiety are shown in different line types and colors (dotted versus solid lines represent different participants). Although the mean level of anxiety is 1 on a scale of 0–4, the significant variation in responses invites examination of individuals and subgroups.

More »

Fig 4 Expand