Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

< Back to Article

Fig 1.

Flow diagram.

APL: acute promyelocytic leukemia, AI: cytarabine plus idarubicin, AD: cytarabine plus daunorubicin.

More »

Fig 1 Expand

Fig 2.

Patients stratified by age group (A) and cytogenetic risk (B).

More »

Fig 2 Expand

Table 1.

Baseline characteristics.

More »

Table 1 Expand

Fig 3.

Proportions of patients who received remission induction chemotherapy (A) and who achieved complete remission (CR) (B) by age group (all patients); Acute promyelocytic leukemia (APL) patients (C) and non-APL patients (D) who received remission induction chemotherapy and who achieved CR by age group.

More »

Fig 3 Expand

Fig 4.

Overall survival (OS) of all patients (n = 3,011) according to age group (A) and cytogenetic risk (B).

More »

Fig 4 Expand

Table 2.

Comparison of complete remission (CR) rates between patients receiving the cytarabine plus idarubicin (AI) and cytarabine plus daunorubicin (AD) treatment regimens according to age group.

More »

Table 2 Expand

Fig 5.

Overall survival (OS) comparison of cytarabine plus idarubicin (n = 1,155) and cytarabine plus daunorubicin (n = 255) in all non–acute promyelocytic leukemia patients (A), those 60 years or younger (B), and those older than 60 years (C).

More »

Fig 5 Expand

Fig 6.

Overall survival (OS) comparison of cytarabine plus idarubicin and cytarabine plus daunorubicin (AD) by cytogenetic risk: Favorable risk (A), intermediate risk (B), and poor risk (C).

More »

Fig 6 Expand