Table 1.
The notations of the proposed problem.
Fig 1.
The overall flowchart of IMOSA algorithm.
Fig 2.
A solution representation.
Table 2.
Comparisons of performance indicators of two algorithms.
Fig 3.
Road network with potential roads in the layout of the waste transfer station.
Table 3.
The corresponding scheme and objective function value of Pareto optimal solution of Model 1.
Fig 4.
The optimal solutions in Model 1.
Table 4.
NIMBY distance and waste transportation cost of population centers in scheme #5 under Model 1.
Fig 5.
The distribution of the Pareto optimal solution of Model 2 in the three-dimensional coordinate system (p = 2).
Fig 6.
Waste transfer station layout and road upgrading results of scheme #26 under Model 2.
Table 5.
The NIMBY distance and waste transportation cost of population centers in scheme #26 under Model 2.
Fig 7.
The distribution of the Pareto optimal solution of Model 3 in the three-dimensional coordinate system (p = 2).
Fig 8.
Waste transfer station layout and road upgrading results of scheme #24 under Model 3.
Table 6.
The NIMBY distance and waste transportation cost of population centers in scheme #24 under Model 3.
Fig 9.
Spatial distribution of waste transportation costs in various settlements under various scenarios.