Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

< Back to Article

Fig 1.

Causal diagram representing the relationship between dog-level and community-level factors and the odds of a call being related to a dog poisoning event from a cannabis product.

More »

Fig 1 Expand

Table 1.

Descriptive statistics concerning the frequency of calls made on behalf of US dogs to the APCCa for cannabis and non-cannabis poisoning events from each year of the study (2009–2014).

More »

Table 1 Expand

Table 2.

The characteristics of calls made on behalf of dogs from the US reporting poisoning events to the APCCa (2009–2014).

More »

Table 2 Expand

Table 3.

The frequency of US dogs reported to the APCCa associated with each county and state-level variable (2009–2014).

More »

Table 3 Expand

Table 4.

Descriptive statistics depicting county-level continuous variables (2009–2014).

More »

Table 4 Expand

Table 5.

Results of univariable mixed logistic regression models examining associations between each individual dog-level variable on the odds of a US dog-associated poisoning call to the APCCa being related to cannabis (2009–2014).

More »

Table 5 Expand

Table 6.

Results of univariable mixed logistic regression models examining the associations between each individual community-level variable on the odds of a US dog-associated poisoning call to the APCCa being related to cannabis (2009–2014).

More »

Table 6 Expand

Table 7.

Results of multivariable mixed logistic regression model examining the associations between each dog-level and community-level variable on the odds of a poisoning call to the APCCa being related to cannabis (2009–2014).

More »

Table 7 Expand

Table 8.

Table of contrasts* examining the associations between each breed class on the odds of a poisoning call to the APCCa being related to cannabis (2009–2014).

More »

Table 8 Expand